Blog

image for Should You Buy the Dip? What This Strategy Really Costs You

Share this Post

Michael Reynolds sitting by a microphone and computer

Need help with your money or investments? Book a consultation to learn more about working together.

Book Online

Should You Buy the Dip? What This Strategy Really Costs You

March 9, 2026 | Michael Reynolds, CFP®

Whenever the market gets choppy, many investors start to ask this question: should I buy the dip?

It makes intuitive sense. Prices are lower than they were. You could get more shares for less money. It feels like buying something on sale.

But the strategy is more complicated than it sounds, and for most investors, it introduces more risk than it removes. Here is what you need to understand before you decide to wait for a dip.

What Does "Buying the Dip" Actually Mean?

At its core, buying the dip means purchasing investments at a lower price point with the expectation that prices will recover and rise. The goal is to take advantage of a temporary decline rather than investing at whatever price the market happens to be sitting at right now.

There are really two different versions of this approach, and they are not the same thing.

Version One: Holding Cash and Waiting for a Dip

This is the more aggressive version. You have money available to invest, but you deliberately hold it in cash and wait for the market to drop to a certain level before you buy. You set a threshold in your head, maybe 10%, 20%, or even 50% down, and you wait.

This approach is where most of the risk lives.

Version Two: Investing Cash That Was Already Ready to Go

This is the more passive version. You already have money set aside to invest, and when you notice the market is down, you decide now is a good time to put it to work. The dip is a catalyst, not a condition.

This version is much less problematic, and we will come back to it.

The Problem With Waiting for the "Right" Dip

When people talk about buying the dip as a deliberate strategy, they are almost always describing version one: holding cash and waiting. And this is where the math starts working against you.

You Might Never Get the Dip You Are Waiting For

This is the most underappreciated risk of the strategy. Markets do not owe you a dip at a specific percentage. If your threshold is a 20% drop, you need a major bear market or crisis to trigger your buy.

Consider this: if you had followed a 20% threshold strategy starting in 2009 and held it through 2026, you would have sat in cash the entire 17 years. The market kept climbing. You never saw that 20% drop. And while you waited, the market compounded year after year without you (albeit with a few close dips along the way).

That is what actually happens when investors set rigid thresholds and wait for conditions that may never arrive.

Even When You Get a Dip, It May Not Be a Discount

Here is a scenario worth thinking through carefully.

Say you decide to wait until the market drops 20% before you invest. While you are waiting, the market doubles. Then it pulls back 20%. You see your threshold hit, and you buy.

The problem? You are still buying in at roughly 60% above where you started. You did not buy a discount. You bought a premium compared to where you would have been if you had just invested at the beginning.

A dip is only a discount relative to recent prices. It is not a discount relative to where you originally had the money available to invest.

The Difference in Returns Is Smaller Than You Think

Research has consistently shown that the performance difference between buying at market lows versus dollar cost averaging is minimal. One study looked at a five-year period and compared three approaches: investing at the lowest point of the year, investing at the highest point, and dollar cost averaging throughout.

The difference between the best-case dip buyer and the steady dollar cost averager was less than one percent in annualized returns.

Even in the best-case scenario, where you perfectly time every dip, the reward is marginal. And of course, no one times every dip perfectly.

Why Dollar Cost Averaging Works Better for Most Investors

Dollar cost averaging means investing a fixed amount on a consistent schedule, regardless of what the market is doing. Every month, the same contribution goes in. Some months, you buy when prices are high. Some months, you buy when prices are low. Over time, your average cost per share evens out.

The strategy works not because it is mathematically optimal in every scenario, but because it removes emotion from the decision. There is no waiting, no second-guessing, no threshold to meet. The money goes in and starts working.

The biggest enemy of long-term investment returns is not a bad market. It is unforced errors, decisions driven by emotion that pull investors off a sound strategy. Dollar cost averaging largely eliminates the conditions that create those errors.

Don't try to be clever. Just being consistent. And consistency beats cleverness over a long time horizon far more often than not.

When "Buying the Dip" Is Actually Fine

Remember version two from earlier? The investor who already has cash ready to invest and uses the dip as a reason to act now rather than later?

That approach is generally fine.

If you have been sitting on cash that is genuinely earmarked for investing, and a market pullback gives you the psychological push you need to go ahead and invest it, that is a reasonable outcome. You are not holding out for a specific threshold. You are just using current conditions as a nudge to stop procrastinating.

Whatever moves money from the sidelines into the market sooner tends to be a good thing. Time in the market is almost always more valuable than timing the market.

The key distinction is intent. Are you using the dip as motivation to do something you were already going to do? Or are you using it as a condition that has to be met before you will invest at all? The first is a nudge. The second is a strategy, and strategies built around market timing rarely deliver what they promise.

Bottom line: getting invested as soon as possible is generally ideal (assuming this is money meant for the long term).

The Practical Approach to Put in Place

Rather than watching for dips, here is a framework that tends to produce better outcomes for long-term investors.

  • Set up automatic monthly contributions to your investment accounts. Recurring contributions are the engine of long-term wealth building. Take the decision out of your hands.
  • When you have extra cash available, put it in. Do not wait for a specific entry point. Invest it when it fits your financial plan and when you have it.
  • Resist the urge to time the market. The research is clear that very few investors, even professional ones, beat a simple, consistent strategy over long periods.
  • Work with a financial advisor to align your investment strategy with your overall financial plan, not just with current market conditions.

Markets will always have dips. They have always recovered. Your job as an investor is not to predict when those dips arrive. Your job is to stay invested, stay consistent, and let time and compounding do the heavy lifting.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is buying the dip ever a smart strategy?

It can be, in limited circumstances. If you already have cash that you planned to invest and a market pullback motivates you to act, that is a reasonable outcome. The problem arises when buying the dip becomes a waiting strategy, where you hold cash indefinitely until the market drops to a specific level. That approach tends to leave investors on the sidelines too long and costs them more in missed gains than they save from buying at a lower price.

How does dollar cost averaging compare to buying the dip?

Studies show the performance difference between perfectly timed dip buying and consistent dollar cost averaging is surprisingly small, often less than one percent annually. But dollar cost averaging has a major advantage: it is automatic, emotion-free, and does not require you to predict market movements. Most investors who try to time dips underperform compared to those who simply invest consistently over time.

What if I have a large lump sum to invest? Should I wait for a dip?

Research generally shows that investing a lump sum as soon as possible outperforms waiting for a dip in most market conditions. The longer your money sits in cash, the more you miss out on potential returns. If you are nervous about investing all at once, a reasonable approach is to spread it over a few months to ease in gradually, but waiting indefinitely for a specific threshold is not a sound strategy.

What counts as a dip worth buying?

There is no universal answer, which is part of the problem with the strategy. A 5% pullback might not feel significant enough to act on. A 20% drop might seem compelling, but it may still be far above where you first had the money ready to invest. The absence of a clear, objective threshold is one reason why dip-buying strategies tend to create more confusion than clarity.

How do I know if my investment strategy is on track?

Regular reviews with a financial advisor are the most reliable way to evaluate whether your investment approach aligns with your goals, timeline, and risk tolerance. A good advisor will help you focus on the factors that actually drive long-term wealth, including consistent contributions, appropriate asset allocation, and tax-efficient account structures, rather than reacting to short-term market movements.

If you have questions about your investment strategy or would like to talk through how dollar cost averaging fits into your financial plan, feel free to reach out. You can book a free consultation to learn more.

Image for Michael Reynolds, CFP®

Michael Reynolds, CFP®

Michael Reynolds, CFP® is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ and Principal at Elevation Financial LLC. He is also host of Wealth Redefined®, a weekly podcast on finance and wealth-building.

 Michael has been featured in prominent publications such as NPR, NerdWallet, and CBS News. He serves clients virtually throughout the U.S.